The Precincts
Avan 1/08: Civil Contract 365, Strong Armenia 229, Hayastan 110. Avan 1/14: CC 428, SA 324, Hayastan 159. Avan 1/21: CC 339, SA 285, Hayastan 99. Ajapnyak 6/34: CC 510, SA 237, Hayastan 120, Bargavach 38. Ajapnyak 6/33: CC 529, SA 257, Hayastan 142, Bargavach 18.
Avan's three precincts cluster around CC 50-55 percent of two-party vote. Ajapnyak's two precincts run higher at roughly CC 65 percent of two-party vote -- Ajapnyak is more solidly Civil Contract than Avan. Both districts confirm what the Davtashen full aggregate also showed: Strong Armenia is the dominant Yerevan opposition force, while the Hayastan alliance -- Kocharyan's bloc -- is structurally smaller in the Yerevan electorate than it was framed in the closing-week campaign.
The Two-Party Structure Implication
If the within-Yerevan two-party CC/SA structure holds across all 12 administrative districts, the Yerevan-wide CC share lands somewhere in the 45-50 percent range -- decisively below the 56-60 percent rural figures and decisively below the 56.04% Pashinyan-victory framing. The Yerevan vote is also concentrated in the count progression that has not yet been aggregated: the 1,000+ precincts unreleased after the 404-precinct cut.
The political implication: the post-vote coalition arithmetic depends materially on whether Strong Armenia's roughly 22 percent national share translates into proportional Yerevan seats. Under Armenia's proportional system, Yerevan-concentrated parties are not disadvantaged by geographic concentration the way they would be in a first-past-the-post system. Strong Armenia's coming 8 June morning statement will need to position itself as a viable Yerevan opposition force regardless of the national CC majority. The precinct data we have so far supports that positioning empirically.
Sources: Armtimes.com, 8 June 2026 00:12 UTC (Avan + Ajapnyak five precincts) · OWL live blog